Where the units are and who operates them
3,044 of the 5,570 Brazilian municipalities have no active establishment of the measured networks in the CNPJ records
Municipalities with no active establishment of the 503 measured networks in the CNPJ records, out of a total of 5,570. Absence from the records does not prove real absence and does not indicate a business opportunity
See the full table (7 rows)
| Municipality size | Municipalities | No active establishment | Share | Population in these municipalities | No previous record | Previously recorded | Appear in a locator | No indication in another source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up to 5,000 inhabitants | 1,324 | 1,255 | 94.8% | 4,180,895 | 1,194 | 61 | 85 | 1,054 |
| 5,000 to 10,000 inhabitants | 1,170 | 919 | 78.5% | 6,428,701 | 762 | 157 | 121 | 662 |
| 10,000 to 20,000 inhabitants | 1,366 | 678 | 49.6% | 9,090,601 | 528 | 150 | 119 | 426 |
| 20,000 to 50,000 inhabitants | 1,053 | 185 | 17.6% | 4,887,525 | 113 | 72 | 52 | 74 |
| 50,000 to 100,000 inhabitants | 338 | 7 | 2.1% | 417,730 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| More than 100,000 inhabitants | 319 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| All municipalities | 5,570 | 3,044 | 54.6% | 25,005,452 | 2,599 | 445 | 381 | 2,219 |
By stateAlphabetical order. The last column shows the municipalities with a first unit since January 2023, and cells from 1 to 4 are not published.
| State | Municipalities | No active establishment | Share | Population in these municipalities | Share of population | No previous record | Appear in a locator | First unit since 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC | 22 | 14 | 63.6% | 213,226 | 25.7% | 12 | 3 | fewer than 5 |
| AL | 102 | 60 | 58.8% | 693,930 | 22.2% | 52 | 2 | fewer than 5 |
| AM | 62 | 52 | 83.9% | 1,221,278 | 31.0% | 48 | 4 | fewer than 5 |
| AP | 16 | 11 | 68.8% | 116,809 | 15.9% | 11 | 3 | 0 |
| BA | 417 | 265 | 63.5% | 3,644,674 | 25.8% | 221 | 28 | 16 |
| CE | 184 | 81 | 44.0% | 1,250,451 | 14.2% | 65 | 14 | 11 |
| DF | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ES | 78 | 17 | 21.8% | 174,185 | 4.5% | 12 | 2 | 5 |
| GO | 246 | 134 | 54.5% | 620,157 | 8.8% | 110 | 9 | 11 |
| MA | 217 | 123 | 56.7% | 1,636,179 | 24.1% | 98 | 14 | 8 |
| MG | 853 | 465 | 54.5% | 2,677,814 | 13.0% | 412 | 45 | 49 |
| MS | 79 | 30 | 38.0% | 245,319 | 8.9% | 22 | 5 | fewer than 5 |
| MT | 141 | 61 | 43.3% | 338,956 | 9.3% | 49 | 11 | 6 |
| PA | 144 | 63 | 43.8% | 1,299,539 | 16.0% | 51 | 5 | 17 |
| PB | 223 | 172 | 77.1% | 1,222,614 | 30.8% | 163 | 10 | 5 |
| PE | 185 | 88 | 47.6% | 1,477,505 | 16.3% | 60 | 17 | 7 |
| PI | 224 | 186 | 83.0% | 1,189,764 | 36.4% | 178 | 7 | fewer than 5 |
| PR | 399 | 184 | 46.1% | 1,052,770 | 9.2% | 143 | 37 | 12 |
| RJ | 92 | 15 | 16.3% | 207,722 | 1.3% | 9 | 4 | 5 |
| RN | 167 | 117 | 70.1% | 829,507 | 25.1% | 97 | 4 | 5 |
| RO | 52 | 24 | 46.2% | 171,082 | 10.8% | 19 | 9 | 0 |
| RR | 15 | 10 | 66.7% | 139,251 | 21.9% | 10 | 0 | fewer than 5 |
| RS | 497 | 340 | 68.4% | 1,647,679 | 15.1% | 306 | 43 | 12 |
| SC | 295 | 137 | 46.4% | 660,835 | 8.7% | 117 | 69 | 10 |
| SE | 75 | 49 | 65.3% | 497,041 | 22.5% | 43 | 0 | 6 |
| SP | 645 | 237 | 36.7% | 1,267,218 | 2.9% | 190 | 34 | 27 |
| TO | 139 | 109 | 78.4% | 509,947 | 33.7% | 101 | 2 | 5 |
By state and municipality sizeMunicipalities with no active establishment, out of the total in the band in each state, by population in the 2022 Census.
| State | Up to 5,000 | 5,000 to 10,000 | 10,000 to 20,000 | 20,000 to 50,000 | 50,000 to 100,000 | More than 100,000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC | 0 of 0 | 3 of 3 | 9 of 12 | 2 of 5 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 1 |
| AL | 9 of 9 | 23 of 24 | 18 of 30 | 10 of 29 | 0 of 8 | 0 of 2 |
| AM | 0 of 0 | 2 of 2 | 24 of 24 | 23 of 24 | 3 of 9 | 0 of 3 |
| AP | 2 of 3 | 3 of 3 | 5 of 5 | 1 of 3 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 2 |
| BA | 10 of 12 | 62 of 64 | 155 of 181 | 38 of 118 | 0 of 24 | 0 of 18 |
| CE | 1 of 1 | 16 of 20 | 46 of 66 | 17 of 60 | 1 of 29 | 0 of 8 |
| DF | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 1 |
| ES | 0 of 0 | 8 of 10 | 8 of 32 | 1 of 25 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 9 |
| GO | 98 of 103 | 30 of 47 | 5 of 41 | 1 of 31 | 0 of 9 | 0 of 15 |
| MA | 5 of 5 | 37 of 37 | 65 of 87 | 16 of 66 | 0 of 12 | 0 of 10 |
| MG | 233 of 247 | 174 of 235 | 58 of 184 | 0 of 115 | 0 of 38 | 0 of 34 |
| MS | 7 of 7 | 14 of 18 | 8 of 22 | 1 of 26 | 0 of 3 | 0 of 3 |
| MT | 35 of 36 | 17 of 31 | 9 of 38 | 0 of 23 | 0 of 7 | 0 of 6 |
| PA | 2 of 2 | 10 of 10 | 20 of 28 | 29 of 62 | 2 of 27 | 0 of 15 |
| PB | 69 of 70 | 67 of 71 | 34 of 50 | 2 of 22 | 0 of 6 | 0 of 4 |
| PE | 1 of 3 | 13 of 16 | 51 of 67 | 22 of 66 | 1 of 21 | 0 of 12 |
| PI | 83 of 84 | 75 of 77 | 27 of 37 | 1 of 21 | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 |
| PR | 94 of 102 | 71 of 104 | 19 of 101 | 0 of 57 | 0 of 13 | 0 of 22 |
| RJ | 0 of 0 | 4 of 6 | 9 of 20 | 2 of 29 | 0 of 9 | 0 of 28 |
| RN | 49 of 52 | 40 of 47 | 25 of 41 | 3 of 18 | 0 of 5 | 0 of 4 |
| RO | 7 of 7 | 13 of 15 | 4 of 13 | 0 of 10 | 0 of 5 | 0 of 2 |
| RR | 0 of 0 | 2 of 2 | 6 of 9 | 2 of 3 | 0 of 0 | 0 of 1 |
| RS | 228 of 237 | 87 of 98 | 18 of 55 | 7 of 64 | 0 of 24 | 0 of 19 |
| SC | 95 of 102 | 32 of 60 | 9 of 61 | 1 of 40 | 0 of 18 | 0 of 14 |
| SE | 12 of 12 | 16 of 16 | 16 of 23 | 5 of 17 | 0 of 3 | 0 of 4 |
| SP | 141 of 150 | 74 of 123 | 21 of 120 | 1 of 115 | 0 of 59 | 0 of 78 |
| TO | 74 of 80 | 26 of 31 | 9 of 19 | 0 of 4 | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 |
By GDP per capita quintileEach quintile holds a fifth of the population, as in the indicator of presence by income. GDP per capita is not equivalent to household income.
| Quintile | Municipalities | No active establishment | Share | Population in these municipalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poorest quintile | 2,117 | 1,468 | 69.3% | 15,477,577 |
| Second quintile | 1,124 | 576 | 51.2% | 4,127,692 |
| Third quintile | 1,159 | 531 | 45.8% | 2,818,038 |
| Fourth quintile | 608 | 239 | 39.3% | 1,293,582 |
| Wealthiest quintile | 562 | 230 | 40.9% | 1,288,563 |
By size and GDP per capita quintileShare of municipalities with no active establishment in each combination. Combinations with fewer than 5 municipalities are not shown.
| Size | Poorest quintile | Second quintile | Third quintile | Fourth quintile | Wealthiest quintile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up to 5,000 inhabitants | 97.2% | 92.0% | 95.0% | 94.4% | 93.9% |
| 5,000 to 10,000 inhabitants | 90.2% | 75.9% | 67.6% | 68.6% | 65.8% |
| 10,000 to 20,000 inhabitants | 73.2% | 40.4% | 21.6% | 16.8% | 14.9% |
| 20,000 to 50,000 inhabitants | 34.4% | 11.4% | 3.0% | 2.5% | 4.1% |
| 50,000 to 100,000 inhabitants | 6.5% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| More than 100,000 inhabitants | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Largest municipalities with no active establishmentThe 30 with the largest population in the 2022 Census. The locator column indicates when the website of a measured network lists an address in the municipality, in which case the absence is in the records only, and the list does not indicate a business opportunity.
| Municipality | Population in 2022 | GDP per capita | Record in the registry | Appears in a locator | Active non-measured network |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbalha (CE) | 75,033 | R$ 20,524 | Previous record | Yes | Yes |
| Tabatinga (AM) | 66,764 | R$ 11,755 | No previous record | Yes | No |
| Escada (PE) | 59,891 | R$ 25,418 | Previous record | Yes | Yes |
| Viseu (PA) | 58,692 | R$ 14,034 | No previous record | No | No |
| Manicoré (AM) | 53,914 | R$ 16,040 | Previous record | Yes | No |
| São Gabriel da Cachoeira (AM) | 51,795 | R$ 10,361 | Previous record | No | No |
| Baião (PA) | 51,641 | R$ 14,287 | Previous record | No | No |
| União (PI) | 46,119 | R$ 12,768 | Previous record | Yes | Yes |
| Lábrea (AM) | 45,448 | R$ 15,186 | No previous record | No | No |
| Muaná (PA) | 45,368 | R$ 9,486 | No previous record | No | No |
| Augusto Corrêa (PA) | 44,573 | R$ 10,298 | No previous record | No | No |
| Autazes (AM) | 41,564 | R$ 12,906 | No previous record | No | No |
| Mangaratiba (RJ) | 41,220 | R$ 78,940 | Previous record | Yes | No |
| Porto de Moz (PA) | 40,597 | R$ 11,613 | No previous record | No | No |
| Araioses (MA) | 39,052 | R$ 8,722 | No previous record | No | Yes |
| São Francisco do Conde (BA) | 38,733 | R$ 647,555 | Previous record | No | No |
| Benjamin Constant (AM) | 37,648 | R$ 11,589 | No previous record | No | No |
| Bom Jardim (PE) | 37,629 | R$ 10,669 | Previous record | Yes | No |
| Sirinhaém (PE) | 37,596 | R$ 21,956 | No previous record | Yes | No |
| Aliança (PE) | 35,741 | R$ 12,642 | Previous record | Yes | No |
| Prainha (PA) | 35,577 | R$ 14,324 | No previous record | No | No |
| Boca do Acre (AM) | 35,447 | R$ 17,302 | Previous record | No | No |
| Feijó (AC) | 35,426 | R$ 19,694 | No previous record | Yes | No |
| Pilão Arcado (BA) | 35,357 | R$ 9,851 | No previous record | No | No |
| Bodocó (PE) | 34,478 | R$ 10,746 | Previous record | Yes | No |
| Itaporanga d'Ajuda (SE) | 34,411 | R$ 15,681 | Previous record | No | No |
| Almeirim (PA) | 34,280 | R$ 16,344 | Previous record | Yes | No |
| Curaçá (BA) | 34,180 | R$ 13,879 | Previous record | No | No |
| Brejo (MA) | 34,120 | R$ 12,073 | Previous record | No | No |
| São Domingos do Maranhão (MA) | 34,034 | R$ 13,624 | Previous record | Yes | Yes |
First unit by yearMunicipalities whose oldest CNPJ attributed to the measured networks was opened in the year, in any registration status. The rate divides this number by the municipalities with no record at the start of the year. The year 2026 runs through the reference month of October 2026.
| Year | Municipalities with the first unit | In networks with 30 CNPJs before 2021 | No record at the start of the year | Entry rate | CNPJs opened in municipalities with up to 50,000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 74 | n.a. | 3,560 | 2.08% | 423 |
| 2016 | 56 | n.a. | 3,486 | 1.61% | 420 |
| 2017 | 68 | n.a. | 3,430 | 1.98% | 466 |
| 2018 | 78 | n.a. | 3,362 | 2.32% | 509 |
| 2019 | 87 | n.a. | 3,284 | 2.65% | 676 |
| 2020 | 102 | n.a. | 3,197 | 3.19% | 772 |
| 2021 | 140 | 134 | 3,095 | 4.52% | 1,212 |
| 2022 | 125 | 112 | 2,955 | 4.23% | 1,240 |
| 2023 | 98 | 77 | 2,830 | 3.46% | 1,081 |
| 2024 | 59 | 44 | 2,732 | 2.16% | 1,031 |
| 2025 | 47 | 32 | 2,673 | 1.76% | 908 |
| 2026 | 27 | 21 | 2,626 | 1.03% | 512 |
First unit since 2023, by size231 municipalities, of which 28 no longer have an active establishment.
| Size | Municipalities with the first unit | Share of municipalities in the band |
|---|---|---|
| Up to 5,000 inhabitants | 29 | 2.2% |
| 5,000 to 10,000 inhabitants | 71 | 6.1% |
| 10,000 to 20,000 inhabitants | 91 | 6.7% |
| 20,000 to 50,000 inhabitants | 34 | 3.2% |
| 50,000 to 100,000 inhabitants | 6 | 1.8% |
| More than 100,000 inhabitants | 0 | 0.0% |
Largest municipalities with a first unit since 2023The 15 with the largest population, with an active establishment, excluding networks with namesake risk. The network is not identified.
| Municipality | Population in 2022 | Year of the first unit | Active establishments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moju (PA) | 84,094 | 2024 | fewer than 5 |
| Maués (AM) | 61,204 | 2024 | fewer than 5 |
| Iranduba (AM) | 61,163 | 2024 | fewer than 5 |
| Acará (PA) | 59,023 | 2025 | fewer than 5 |
| Juruti (PA) | 50,881 | 2024 | fewer than 5 |
| Amontada (CE) | 42,156 | 2025 | fewer than 5 |
| Curuçá (PA) | 41,262 | 2025 | fewer than 5 |
| Sento Sé (BA) | 38,154 | 2025 | fewer than 5 |
| Afuá (PA) | 37,765 | 2026 | fewer than 5 |
| Poço Redondo (SE) | 33,439 | 2025 | fewer than 5 |
| Bela Cruz (CE) | 32,775 | 2024 | fewer than 5 |
| São Sebastião (AL) | 31,786 | 2023 | fewer than 5 |
| Capela (SE) | 31,645 | 2023 | fewer than 5 |
| Riacho de Santana (BA) | 30,711 | 2025 | fewer than 5 |
| Pedras de Fogo (PB) | 29,662 | 2023 | fewer than 5 |
Categories of first units in municipalities with up to 50,000 inhabitantsShare of first units and of other openings in these municipalities, in 211 first units since 2023 and 680 from 2015 to 2022. When a single network exceeds 50% of the category's first units, the table indicates it, because the category then reflects that network.
| Category | First units since 2023 | Share | Share of other openings | First units, 2015 to 2022 | Share | Share of other openings | Difference, windows combined, in points (95% interval) | Higher in both windows | One network above 50% since 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chocolate | 41 | 19.4% | 12.5% | 79 | 11.6% | 13.4% | 0.5 (-1.5 to 4.3) | No | Yes |
| Dentistry | 34 | 16.1% | 10.5% | 183 | 26.9% | 23.2% | 6.3 (-2.4 to 13.4) | No | No |
| Vehicle inspection | 26 | 12.3% | 3.2% | 45 | 6.6% | 5.2% | 3.6 (1.0 to 7.8) | Yes | No |
| Language schools | 13 | 6.2% | 4.9% | 39 | 5.7% | 6.2% | 0.1 (-1.4 to 2.7) | No | Yes |
| Laundry | 13 | 6.2% | 5.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 1.3% | n.a. | No | No |
| Pharmacy | 12 | 5.7% | 2.8% | 39 | 5.7% | 2.5% | 3.1 (0.4 to 7.5) | Yes | No |
| Açaí | 11 | 5.2% | 8.6% | 31 | 4.6% | 3.7% | -1.0 (-5.9 to 3.3) | No | Yes |
| Credit and purchasing consortia | 11 | 5.2% | 1.7% | 15 | 2.2% | 1.8% | 1.2 (-0.8 to 4.5) | No | No |
| Cosmetics | 7 | 3.3% | 5.0% | 42 | 6.2% | 4.3% | 0.9 (-1.5 to 4.6) | No | Yes |
| Clothing | 6 | 2.8% | 1.6% | 9 | 1.3% | 1.8% | 0.0 (-0.9 to 1.1) | No | No |
| Ice cream shop | fewer than 5 | n.a. | 2.6% | 27 | 4.0% | 3.0% | n.a. | No | n.a. |
| Solar energy | fewer than 5 | n.a. | 0.7% | 9 | 1.3% | 0.8% | n.a. | No | n.a. |
| Internet and telecommunications | fewer than 5 | n.a. | n.a. | 20 | 2.9% | 0.4% | n.a. | No | n.a. |
| Milkshakes | fewer than 5 | n.a. | 1.8% | 11 | 1.6% | 1.4% | n.a. | No | n.a. |
| Vocational courses | fewer than 5 | n.a. | 0.8% | 7 | 1.0% | 1.5% | n.a. | No | n.a. |
| Optical store | fewer than 5 | n.a. | 3.7% | 7 | 1.0% | 3.9% | n.a. | No | n.a. |
| Mattresses | fewer than 5 | n.a. | 0.8% | 6 | 0.9% | 1.4% | n.a. | No | n.a. |
| Footwear | 0 | 0.0% | 0.7% | 11 | 1.6% | 0.9% | n.a. | No | n.a. |
| Home goods | 0 | 0.0% | 0.2% | 6 | 0.9% | 0.3% | n.a. | No | n.a. |
| Children's fashion | 0 | 0.0% | 0.7% | 5 | 0.7% | 0.5% | n.a. | No | n.a. |
Movement between snapshots of the recordsMunicipalities with an active establishment in May 2023 and in October 2026, a measure independent of the opening date.
| Status | Municipalities |
|---|---|
| With an active establishment in May 2023 | 2,454 |
| With an active establishment in October 2026 | 2,526 |
| Came to have one | 289 |
| First presence | 171 |
| Return with a new CNPJ, after a previous record | 58 |
| CNPJ older than the snapshot | 60 |
| Ceased to have one | 217 |
Sensitivity of the countEffect of each methodological choice on the two main figures.
| Subset | Municipalities |
|---|---|
| No active establishment | 3,044 |
| No active establishment and no address in a locator | 2,663 |
| No active establishment, no locator, no non-measured network and no CNPJ in another activity | 2,219 |
| First unit since 2023 | 231 |
| First unit since 2023, with the current list only, without earlier snapshots | 245 |
| First unit since 2023, excluding networks with namesake risk | 229 |
| First unit since 2023, with an active establishment today | 203 |
| First unit since 2023, outside metropolitan areas | 177 |
The CNPJ (Brazilian company registry) records report the municipality of each establishment, which makes it possible to identify where none of the 503 measured networks has an active establishment under its own trade name. In the reference month of October 2026, this occurs in 3,044 of the 5,570 municipalities (54.6%), which add up to 25.0 million inhabitants in the 2022 Census, or 12.3% of the population. The measure describes the records. Absence from the records does not prove the real absence of a unit and does not indicate a business opportunity: 381 of these municipalities appear in the store locator of at least one measured network, 177 have an active establishment of a census network with fewer than 30 CNPJs and 442 have an active CNPJ with the name of a measured network in another activity. Without any of these indications, 2,219 municipalities remain, which does not prove absence either.
Absence follows size. It affects 94.8% of municipalities with up to 5,000 inhabitants, 49.6% of those with 10,000 to 20,000, 17.6% of those with 20,000 to 50,000 and 7 of the 338 with 50,000 to 100,000, and none above 100,000. By GDP per capita, with the quintiles used in the indicator of presence by income, the share ranges from 69.3% in the poorest quintile to 40.9% in the wealthiest, and within the same size, among municipalities with 10,000 to 20,000 inhabitants, from 73.2% to 14.9%. Among states with 20 municipalities or more, the share ranges from 16.3% (Rio de Janeiro) to 83.9% (Amazonas). Of the total, 2,599 municipalities have never had a CNPJ attributed to the measured networks, and 445 have had one, 93 of them with a CNPJ now classified as inapt or suspended, a status that does not count as active. The largest with no indication in another source are Viseu (PA), São Gabriel da Cachoeira (AM) and Baião (PA).
Since January 2023, 231 municipalities have received their first CNPJ of a measured network, counting all registration statuses, so that a municipality whose previous unit was deregistered does not count as an entry. Of these, 203 still have an active establishment. The pace is declining, with 140 first entries in 2021, 47 in 2025 and 27 in 2026, up to the reference month of October 2026. Openings in municipalities with up to 50,000 inhabitants fell less, from 1,212 to 908 CNPJs over the same interval, and, in 2025, 94.9% of them took place in a municipality that already had a record of a measured network. Between the snapshots of the records of May 2023 and October 2026, 289 municipalities came to have an active establishment and 217 ceased to have one.
In municipalities with up to 50,000 inhabitants, chocolate (19.4%), dentistry (16.1%) and vehicle inspection (12.3%) account for 47.9% of first units since 2023. In chocolate, a single network accounts for more than half of the first units, so the category reflects that network's expansion. Compared with other openings in these municipalities, vehicle inspection and pharmacy have a higher share of first units, both from 2015 to 2022 and since 2023.
How we calculate
Presence is the active establishment (registration status 02) that the observatory's census attributes to the 503 networks with at least 30 establishments, in the open CNPJ data of Receita Federal (the federal tax authority), reference month October 2026, with the same criterion as the indicator of presence in municipalities. Size comes from the resident population in the 2022 Census (IBGE, the national statistics institute, SIDRA table 4714), in the 5,570 municipalities that existed at the time of the Census. GDP per capita is that of 2023 divided by the estimated population for 2024, in quintiles that each hold a fifth of the population, the same calculation as in the indicator of presence by income. It does not measure household income.
For the history of each municipality, we gathered all CNPJs attributed to the measured networks in any status, active, deregistered, classified as inapt or suspended, and those that had the network's name in the snapshots of May 2023, October 2024, October 2025 and September 2026 and no longer have it (6,048 CNPJs). The first unit is the CNPJ with the earliest start-of-activity date in this set. Without these snapshots, the count of entries would be 245 municipalities, not 231.
The check on absence uses 343 store locators maintained by the measured networks themselves, read through November 8, 2026, with 62,445 addresses matched by municipality and state, the census networks with fewer than 30 CNPJs and the active CNPJs bearing the name of a measured network under a CNAE (national classification of economic activities) code other than the expected one. The movement between snapshots compares the active establishments of May 2023, with the MEI (individual microentrepreneur regime) comparability rule used in the indicator of network evolution. Of the 289 municipalities that came to have an active establishment, 171 are a first presence, 58 are a return with a new CNPJ after a previous record, and 60 have an active CNPJ older than the snapshot, the case of a company that adopted the brand later or returned to active status.
In the categories, the share of first units is compared with the share of other openings in municipalities with fewer than 50,000 inhabitants, in the windows from 2015 to 2022 and since 2023. A category is flagged when the share is higher in both windows, with at least 5 first units in each, and when the 95% interval of the difference, obtained from 2,000 resamples of networks, lies above zero. The 20 networks with a namesake risk identified when reading the trade names, or with a website that lists fewer than half of the attributed CNPJs, are excluded from this calculation and from the list of names.
What this figure does not show
- Absence from the records is not proof of real absence. The count depends on the trade name, so a unit registered under another name, without a trade name, as an MEI or under a CNPJ from another municipality is left out. In 381 of the 3,044 municipalities (12.5%), the website of at least one measured network lists an address, and this number is a floor, because only 343 of the 503 networks have a locator read. The website, in turn, may be outdated.
- The result does not indicate a business opportunity. It does not consider demand, household income, local competition, operating costs or the networks' territory criteria. A municipality without a measured network may have strong independent retail, a population insufficient for the format or regional networks with fewer than 30 CNPJs.
- The start-of-activity date is that of the CNPJ, not that of the brand's arrival. An older company that adopted the brand later keeps the older date and does not count as an entry, which underestimates entries, and a unit that dropped the brand before May 2023 is not observed, which may record as an entry a municipality that already had a network. Among entries of networks with a locator, the municipality appears on the network's website in 68.0% of cases (119 of 175).
- Namesakes weigh more in small municipalities and especially in the first unit, because a single local business with the same name sets the date. Without the networks at risk, the count of entries would be 229, and the first unit in 15 municipalities belongs to these networks.
- The universe is that of networks existing today with at least 30 CNPJs. Defunct networks are not included, which underestimates past presence, and neither are new networks that are still small, which underestimates the most recent entries and accentuates the decline in the series. In the 346 networks that already had 30 CNPJs before 2021, a panel not subject to this effect, first entries went from 134 in 2021 to 32 in 2025. The year 2026 is incomplete.
- Population totals use the 2022 Census and differ from indicators that use later estimates. Boa Esperança do Norte (MT), established after the Census, is left out. GDP per capita is high in municipalities with a refinery, port or mining without proportional income.
Frequently asked questions
How many Brazilian municipalities have no franchise?
In the CNPJ (Brazilian company registry) records, reference month October 2026, 3,044 of the 5,570 municipalities have no active establishment of the 503 franchise networks measured by the observatory, and they are home to 12.3% of the population in the 2022 Census. The number does not equal municipalities without any franchise, because 381 of them appear on the website of at least one measured network, and networks with fewer than 30 CNPJs are not measured.
What are the largest municipalities without a franchise in Brazil?
Among municipalities with no active establishment of the measured franchise networks and no indication in a store locator, in a smaller census network or in a CNPJ (Brazilian company registry) from another activity, the largest by population in the 2022 Census are Viseu (PA), with 58,692 inhabitants; São Gabriel da Cachoeira (AM), with 51,795 inhabitants; and Baião (PA), with 51,641 inhabitants. Absence from the CNPJ records does not prove the real absence of a unit.
Is a municipality without franchises a business opportunity?
The data do not support that conclusion. The measure describes the CNPJ (Brazilian company registry) records and does not take into account demand, household income, local competition, operating costs or the networks' territory criteria. Absence may result from a population insufficient for the format, from established independent retail or from a unit registered under another trade name.
Which franchises arrive first in small towns?
In Brazilian municipalities with up to 50,000 inhabitants, chocolate (19.4%), dentistry (16.1%) and vehicle inspection (12.3%) account for 47.9% of the first units of measured franchise networks since 2023. In chocolate, a single network accounts for more than half of the first units, so the category reflects that network's expansion. Relative to other openings in these municipalities, vehicle inspection and pharmacy have a higher share of first units, from 2015 to 2022 and since 2023. The data do not evaluate the networks or indicate suitability for small towns.
Report an error on this page (in Portuguese)
Where the units are and who operates themOther indicators in the same group
Maintained by Marktech, which serves franchise networks and franchises. The brands cited belong to their owners and are mentioned here only to identify the network the data refers to.